OHP is procurable through eight Australian Government panels and currently supports Human Systems Integration and Human-Centred Design work at Air Force Headquarters, giving its FRM methodology direct grounding in Defence operational and procurement context rather than being adapted from commercial-sector fatigue consulting.
Why Defence and high-hazard environments need a different FRM approach
Defence and high-hazard operational settings, aviation, resources, emergency services command, combine irregular and extended rostering with physically and cognitively demanding work, often under environmental stressors like heat or protective equipment burden. Fatigue risk in these environments compounds: standard commercial fatigue tools built for office or logistics rostering typically don't model the combined physiological load these roles carry, which means a compliant-looking roster can still under-control real risk.
OHP's approach treats fatigue as one input into the broader human systems integration picture, alongside workload, environmental stressors, and equipment burden, rather than assessing it in isolation.
Panel access and procurement
OHP is procurable through eight Australian Government panels, positioning it for direct engagement by Defence and government high-hazard operational commands without a separate tender process in most cases. This sits alongside OHP's active RAAF engagement, giving current, first-hand context on Defence rostering, workforce, and operational constraints that inform how OHP scopes and delivers FRM work for this sector.
Anthony Walker's 15 years of operational firefighting experience, including station officer command with ACT Fire and Rescue, combined with a PhD in thermal and occupational physiology, means OHP's Defence and high-hazard FRM work is built by someone who has held operational command under genuine fatigue and physical load conditions, not only studied it.
What this looks like in practice
Through The Crucible Method, a Defence or high-hazard FRM engagement typically covers: a Scan-phase diagnostic against current rostering, workload, and incident data; a Sprint-phase framework design incorporating physiological load modelling specific to the operational environment; and a Build-phase implementation with governance structured to Defence or high-hazard reporting and reassessment requirements.
Frequently asked questions
Is OHP available for Defence engagement without a separate tender process?
OHP is procurable through eight Australian Government panels, which in most cases allows direct engagement by eligible Defence and government bodies without a standalone tender.
How does OHP's Defence FRM work differ from general human factors consulting?
It combines fatigue risk modelling with the broader Human Systems Integration context, workload, environmental stressors, equipment burden, drawing on direct current experience supporting Defence (Air Force Headquarters).
What operational experience underpins OHP's high-hazard FRM approach?
OHP's founder holds a PhD in thermal and occupational physiology and spent 15 years in operational firefighting command, including station officer rank, with ACT Fire and Rescue.
Ready to see where fatigue risk actually sits in your operation? The free Crucible Diagnostic takes 15 minutes and shows you.